SHRM is
predicted on two fundamental assertions. First it is the ides that an organization’s
human resources are of critical strategic importance – that the skills,
behaviours and interaction of employees have the potential to provide both the
foundation of strategy formulation and the means for strategy implementation.
Second it is the belief that a firm’s HRM practices are instrumental in the
developing the strategic capability of its pool of human resources. Proponents
of the RBV argue that sustained competitive advantage can originate in a firm’s
resource and thereby draw attention to the internal workings of an
organization. This view places more emphasis on the role of managers in the
selection, development, combination and deployment of firm’s resources, and not
merely on selecting its competitive position in the operating environment.
Some
important questions need to be addressed:
a) How does a firm ensure resources are
aligned to support current strategies, are adaptable to new strategies, and are
able to influence new strategic directions?
b) How does a firm actively build and
continuously renew strategic human and organizational resources to fuel
competitive advantage?
The RBV: An Integrating Ground for SHRM
The RBV
states that a firm develops competitive advantage by not acquiring but also
developing, combining, and effectively deploying its physical, human, and
organizational resources in ways that add unique value and are difficult for
competitors to imitate (Barney, 1991)
Dimensions for Theory in SHRM
Universalistic
perspective –
or best approach asserts that certain independent –dependent variable
relationships hold across whole populations of organizations- that is, some HR
practices are always better than others and all organizations should adopt
them.
Contingency
perspective - effectiveness of
HR practices is contingent on how well they mesh with aspects of the
organization (e.g. what discrete policies would be most appropriate if an
organization were to pursue a low-cost strategy or wanted to encourage new
product innovation)
Configurationally
perspective – focuses
on patterns of HR practices that together form an internally consistent whole
(i.e. their effects are mutually reinforcing) and draws a correlation between
those patterns and organizational performance (Doty &Glick 1994).
Once the
appropriate policies are selected, the firm chooses from the available array of
HR practices, or specific tools to execute the policies. Quality circles or TQM
teams; variable compensation schemes, profit sharing or piecework (all types of incentive pay);
newsletters learning fairs, or town hall meetings to communicate – all HR
practices a firm can implement and align with the policy level and guiding the
principle of this.
NB: Delery
notes that while the resource based view provides a nice backdrop, explaining
the importance of human resources to firm competitiveness, it does not
specifically deal with how an organization can develop and support the human
resources it needs for competitive advantage. (1998: 290). It is difficult to
grasp the precise mechanism by which the interplay of human resources practices
and policies are generating value. To imitate a complex system, it is necessary
to understand how the elements are interacting. Are the effects additive or
multiplicative, or do they involve complex nonlinearities?... it is even
difficult for a competing firm to imitate a valuable hr system by hiring away
one or a few top executives because the understanding of the system is an
organizational capability that is spread across many (not just a few) people in
the firm (Becker & Gerhari 1996:787)
COMPLEXITY AS AN EXTENSION OF THE RBV
Complex RBV: Critical but Difficult Features of
the RBV and Key Features of Complex Systems
Key
features
|
RBV
|
Complexity
|
Creativity/adaptivity
|
Competitive
advantage grows from latent creative potential embedded in firm resources
|
Complex
adaptive systems learn and create new responses to their contextual
environment
|
Complexity
and ambiguity
|
Inimitability
arises from social complexity and causal ambiguity
|
Living
systems are composed of complex interrelationships that are nonlinear,
nondeterministic and unpredictable
|
Disequilibrium,
dynamism, path dependence
|
Complex
relationships build over time and are historically dependent, disequilibrium
is the creative state: dynamism and process issues are paramount
|
Systems
thrive and create a far from equilibrium states; equilibrium leads to
stagnation, decline and death; history matters; paths untold irreversibly
through time
|
System
–level resources
|
Some key
strategic resources are intangible and exist only at the system level, in
relationships
|
Some
elements only exist at the system level, in the dynamic relationships between
things
|
Current Approaches
to HR Strategies: Inside-Out Versus Outside-In
By Patrick M.Wright et al
Conclusion
HR functions
and their corresponding strategies are much better positioned to add value to
firms when they take an outside-in perspective. To develop an outside-in
approach:
a) develop a formal process for
involving line executives in the development of HR strategy
b) have formal mechanisms for tracking
developments in the external environment as part of the process
c) Begin with the assumption that
everything the current HR function is doing is either wrong or does not exist –
ensure that no current or prospective HR processes and systems are considered
before there a deeper understanding of the business and people issues.
d) Identify the key business and people
metrics that will determine or indicate the success of the business, then
constantly track and communicate those metrics o the entire internal HR
community
e) Based on the business issues and
metrics, develop HR strategy that will maximally develop performance on those
metrics
f) Remember that HR strategy is a
process, not a document, intervention, or event – the strategy should be formally
examined for relevance annually, but informally examined on a continual basis.
STRATEGIC
HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES, TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM SOCIAL NETWORKS, AND FIRM
PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES IN CREATING ORGANIZATIONAL
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
Christopher J.Collins & Kevin
D.Clark
HR practices
can only be a source of sustained competitive advantage when they support
resources or competencies that can provide value to a firm (Wright et al.,
2001). Turbulent environmental conditions place a premium on both the speed and
the quality of top management team (TMT) decision making and firm action. A key
factor in a TMT’s ability to achieve both speed and quality is the use of
real-time information (Eisenhardt, 1989). The social networks of top managers,
defined as the systems of relationships top managers have with employees and
other actors outside of their organization, are the chief source of timely and
relevant information on the state of both the external environment and the
organization. Three components of information management lead to effective
action under uncertainty: information gathering (from inside and outside a
firm), processing, and distribution. Through their unique position in the
organization, top managers are able to affect the information flow within the
organization by gathering and redistributing information across key external
actors and internal locales. The structure (size and range) and strength of
ties of TMT external and internal networks provide informational benefits that
lead to competitive advantages and higher firm performance. Further, if TMT
social networks are idiosyncratic because they are created through firm
specific practices, they can lead to sustainable competitive advantage (Barney,
1991). TMT networks that are large and diverse in range provide value to a firm
in the form of information advantages.
SHRM and the Development of TMT Social Networks
HR practices
can enhance performance when they are aligned with one another to manage
employees in a manner that leads to competitive advantage (Delery & Doty,
1996). HR practices can create value for a firm when the individual practices
are aligned to develop critical resources or competencies. The employee based
capabilities built and sustained through HR practices will be difficult to
imitate because these practices and policies may be firm-specific, socially
complex and path dependent (Lado & Wilson, 1994). Even if a set of
practices can be imitated, there will be a considerable lag time between the
implementation of a system and its impact. Performance appraisal and
compensation are the primary HR practices fir use to elicit and reinforce
desired behaviours (Lathan &Wexley, 1981)
A point to
be noted is that since different network characteristics affect firm
performance differently, companies should be careful to create the network
characteristics that are most likely to affect performance in their particular
environmental context.
Business strategy, human resources, labour
market flexibility and competitive
advantage
By Jonathan Michie and Maura Sheehan
A broad
consensus has emerged on the positive relationship between the use of human
resource policies and corporate performance. It is argued that HR policies that
are consistent with the firm’s strategy – strategic human resource management
(SHRM) – are more effective (Miles and Snow et
al 1984). In addition, labour market deregulation and flexibility are
regarded as key determinants of national competitiveness and successful corporate
performance. This paper examines:
a) The effects of HR policy on firm performance
b) The links between strategy, HR and the use of flexible
employment contracts
c) The moderating effects of strategy on the links between
HR, flexible labour and performance
The link between
strategy and HR management
a)
best practice (universalistic perspective) – may
be embodied in a variety of concrete and detailed HR techniques or practices
that will encourage sharing of information within the organization
b)
The contingency approach argues that to be
effective, HR policies and practices must be consistent with the strategy being
implemented (Miles and Snow 1978, 1984. Guthrie et al., 2002). Business
performance will be improved when there is consistency (fit) between business
strategy and HR policies.
c)
The configurational approach differs from the
“best practice” and contingency theories by being guided by a holistic approach
to inquiry and adopting the systems assumption of “equifinality”
configurational SHRM is concerned with the “pattern of planned human resource
deployments and activities intended to enable an organization to achieve its
goals” (Wright and McMahan, 1992: 298). The configurational approach suggests
that the firm must develop HR as a system so that both horizontal and vertical
consistency can be achieved. The configurational perspective suggests that
improved performance will occur only when “vertical” or external consistency
and “horizontal” or internal consistency are achieved.
Competitive Strategies
Porter describes competitive advantage as the “essence of
competitive strategy” and proposes three strategies that companies can use to
this advantage: innovation, quality enhancement and cost reduction. In companies pursuing a cost based strategy, the
logical approach to HR strategy would be to emphasize numerical flexibility and
wage cost minimization. In such situation, the values and goals imbued within
HR would be consistent with the organization’s primary cost reduction goals
(Hogue, 1999: 421)
Labour market flexibility and corporate performance
Labour market deregulation has been regarded as playing a key
role in the drive for a competitive, flexible economy. On the one hand, the use
of flexible work practices can result in savings on wage costs. First, work may
be hired and paid for only if there is work to be done. Second, “flexible”
workers on average earn less than comparable tenured workers and are not
entitled to the benefits of that tenured workers receive, in addition, “the
decisions to hire new workers is taken more easily if workers can be fired more
flexibly under the adverse circumstances. In this way, part of the
entrepreneurial risk is shifted to employees thus making job creation easier
(Kleinknecht et al., 1997:2)
In addition, if the time horizons of firms become shortened,
the pursuit of what economists would characterize as “efficiency gains” may
come to dominate other sorts of gains to be had from innovation and
technological progress. This becomes problematic if the pursuit of short-term efficiency
gains reduces the potential of the system for economic progress (Kleinknecht,
1998; Michie and Prendergast, 1998).
For firm-level analysis, such flexible work practices are
often placed into the following broad areas:
- Numerical flexibility – is the ability of firms to vary the amount of labour employed, by making use of part-time, temporary and seasonal employees, short-term contracts, agency labour, freelance work and homework or out work. The use of this type of labour is commonly referred to as “flexible employment contracts or contingent labour.
- Functional flexibility – the ability to move workers from one task to another.
- Wage or reward flexibility – having payment systems in place that encourage and reward improved performance (for example, performance-related pay.
Whether or not a firm use the types of flexible practices
outlined is likely to reflect a strategic decision made by management. In other
words, the use of flexible employment is likely related to – contingent upon –
the firm’s competitive strategy. In particular, firms that are pursuing a
cost-based strategy will be more likely to use flexible labour compared to
firms pursuing an “innovator/quality –enhancer approach.
Conclusion
One of the aims of managers who invest in “progressive” HR
practices will be to achieve improved corporate performance. If successful, the
costs of such policies can, of course be recouped. A pertinent question then
tends to be what sort of strategy their firm should be pursuing. Additionally,
how much should be invested in HR practices. The degree to which the adoption
of HR practices will indeed improve corporate performance – in statistical
terms, the size and significance of the effect – will vary according to a range
of factors one being the strategy that the firm adopts. It may pursue “high
road” strategy of investing in progressive HR practices in order to
motivate the workforce, to enhance their technical abilities and to provide
opportunities for them to work more productively. In such situations, HR
investment will be positively correlated with productivity and profitability
Alternatively, the firm may choose a low road, cost cutting strategy.
For firms pursuing this type of strategies, it is unlikely that there will be a
high level of investment in HR. in addition, where such HR practices are
pursued, while there is evidence of “best practice” – meaning that investment
in HR in general, especially in a number of policies, is correlated with
performance - such investments are less likely to be more correlated with
statistically significantly improved outcomes than in the case of for firms
pursuing quality and innovation strategies.
There is a reason to believe that the costs of investing in
HR practices will be recouped through improved performance. However, for this
to happen requires not just that the HR practices lead to higher levels of commitment
and motivation among staff, it is also necessary for this to be
matched, first by the skills to work more productively
and, also, by the opportunities to put those skills and motivation to good
effect. For these three factors to be present – motivation, skills and
opportunities – HR practices must be pursued as coherent packages, and combined
with appropriate work organization. The decisions from HR should be consistent
and coherent. And second, where investment in HR practices is appropriate, the
degree to which this investment will pay dividends depends in part on an
appropriate bundling of such practices.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar
komentt yoo..